DEBINT4.GIF (10584 bytes)

 
Inherited EB

Definition
Historical Overview

Diagnostic Tests
Ultrastructure
Immunohistochemistry

Etiopathogenesis
EB Simplex
Junctional EB
Dystrophic EB

Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa

Jo-David Fine, M.D., M.P.H., Eugene A. Bauer, M.D.,
and Tobias Gedde-Dahl Jr., M.D.

Edited by    Jo-David Fine, M.D., M.P.H., Eugene A. Bauer, M.D. Joseph McGuire, M.D. Alan Moshell, M.D.
Published in 1999 by The Johns Hopkins University Press.     ISBN 0-8018-6024-5

DebRA is grateful to the authors and publishers for permission to reproduce extracts from this book to make information more widely available to professionals families and carers.

 

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
Immunohistochemistry

 
In the late 1970s, several proteins, most notably bullous pemphigoid antigen-1, laminin-1, and type IV collagen, were shown to he normal components of the dermoepidermal junction by the use of polyclonal antibodies specific for these proteins and an indirect immunofluorescence staining technique. In 1981, Hintner and colleagues demonstrated that these three different antibodies type could be used to accurately define the level of skin cleavage present in EB skin, thereby permitting proper diagnosis and classification. As will be discussed in greater detail in chapter 3, this immunohistochemical technique, now known as immunofluorescence antigenic mapping, continues to be used as a diagnostic alternative to transmission electron microscopy.

In the early 1980s, a variety of new antigens were detected in the dermoepidermal junction, using monoclonal antibody technique. In December 1983, Goldsmith and Briggaman were the first to use this technique to demonstrate altered staining of two as yet to be characterized anchoring fibril-associated antigens, named AF1 and AF2, in RDEB skin. The following month, Fine and colleagues reported on the semiquantitative alteration in staining of a lamina densa-specific antigen, KF-1, in both RDEB and DDEB skin. Based on these collective findings, both sets of monoclonal antibodies were then used as a means of diagnosing and classifying DEB patients. In 1986, Heagerty, Eady, and colleagues demonstrated absence of staining of RDEB skin with another antibasement membrane-specific monoclonal antibody, LH 7:2, which was later shown to recognize an epitope of type VII collagen. In the same year, Heagerty and co-workers employed two other basement membrane-specific antibodies, GB3 (later shown to recognize laminin-5) and AA3, in the postnatal diagnosis of the Herlitz subtype of generalized JEB. GB3, LH 7:2, and KF-1 monoclonal antibodies were subsequently shown to he useful probes for the pre- natal diagnosis of Herlitz JEB and DEB subtypes, respectively. In 1989, Fine and colleagues identified a new component of the anchoring filament (now termed uncein) with the 19-DEJ-1 monoclonal antibody and then demonstrated its lack of detection in any JEB skin, suggesting its superiority over GB3 as an immunohistochemical probe for the detection of all JEB subtypes. In 1990, Schofield and colleagues more precisely defined the sensitivity and specificity of GB3 as a diagnostic marker of JEB.

 

  top of page


About DebRA | About EB | Management of EB | Research | News & Events | Resources |

DebRA House  13 Wellington Business Park, Dukes Ride, Crowthorne, Berkshire RG45 6LS
Telephone: +44 (0) 1344 771961  Fax: +44 (0) 1344 762661
DebRA is a registered charity
Registered Charity No: 1084958
© DebRA international all rights reserved 2002